Worldview Lens
For scorers, researchers and coaches

Help calibrate the models

Worldview Lens is checked against certified human raters for ego development, where readings now land within one step of an expert rating 91% of the time. The other models have no expert check yet. If you hold texts scored by trained raters, you can change that.

What we're looking for

Texts written by real people, each with the score a trained rater gave it. About 30 scored texts per model is enough to start, ideally spread across several stages. More is better, and item-level scores help as well as overall ones.

ModelScored withStatus
KeganSubject–Object Interview transcripts with their scoresWanted
KohlbergMoral Judgment Interview responses with stage scoresWanted
FowlerFaith Development Interview transcripts with stage scoresWanted
Commons (MHC)Texts or task responses scored for order of hierarchical complexityWanted
TorbertLeadership development profiles (sentence completions) with action-logic ratingsMore welcome; first fit from SCTi data
Cook-Greuter, LoevingerSCTi-MAP or WUSCT protocols with item ratings and TPRCalibrated; more data tightens it

Spiral Dynamics and Wilber's altitudes have no validated way of scoring writing, so they can't be calibrated this way; How scoring works says so. We don't need scoring manuals, only texts and the scores they were given.

How your data is treated

What you get

How to start

Email support@worldviewlens.com with the subject Calibration data. Say which model and instrument, roughly how many scored texts you have, and how they were consented. Please don't attach data in the first email; we'll agree a secure way to share it.